|
1/21/10 Massachusetts Senate
Race Could Derail Health Care Reform. America waits while
House leaders negotiate their new strategy for health care
reform. In yesterday’s stunning upset, Massachusetts US Senate
Seat –formerly held by Democrat Ted Kennedy, was won by
Republican Scott Brown. For voters, the election was a
referendum on the economy. For the rest of America, the
consequences of the Massachusetts election are profound.
Democrats no longer have the filibuster-proof 60-vote majority
in Senate, and health care reform itself may now be in jeopardy.
The White House is still hoping that the House can pass the
Senate bill quickly. Moderates Democrats in the House however,
believe that quickly is no longer an option. They interpret the
Massachusetts phenomenon as a message to Congress to start
focusing on jobs and job creation rather than revamping
America’s health care system.
Regardless, if the Senate bill does pass, then small
nonprofit employers would finally be able to offer affordable
health insurance to their employees. The Senate bill [The
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590)] however,
has our language (Section 1421) creating a 25% to 35% tax credit
that nonprofits could apply to their payroll tax withholding.
The House bill [The Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R.
3962)] does not have this provision. The House bill’s small
businesses tax credit would only apply to for-profit companies.
Basically, the small employer provision in the Senate’s version
of the health care bill helps nonprofits mitigate the excessive
costs so that their employees and their families have access to
quality, affordable coverage
Speaker Pelosi may have to accept the Senate version of the
bill. If the House accepts the Senate bill “as is” they would
need to quickly get it back to the House for a vote before the
new Senator Brown is sworn-in. If the House chooses to amend the
Senate bill, then the amended bill would have to go back to the
Congressional Budget Office for a new score, and receive the 75
hour comment period before it could be put to a vote in the
House. There may even need to be a second conference committee.
Either way, this is unlikely to happen before Senator Brown can
be seated. If House Speaker Pelosi does accept the Senate bill,
even though she has stated publicly that said she wouldn’t, then
a second bill, a reconciliation bill, would be needed later to
incorporate the additional items from the House bill. The real
question is whether she would have the votes at that point to
get it passed. The third alternative is for House leaders to
merely table the bill and move on, leaving health care reform
exactly where they found it. For more on the current status of
health care reform go to
http://www.philly.com/philly/business/82230437.html.
11/17/09 Contact Your US Senator
on Health Care Reform for Nonprofits. On November 7, the US
House of Representatives passed H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health
Care for America Act of 2009, by a vote of 220-215.
Pennsylvania’s Congressional Delegation voted alone party lines
except for Reps. Holden and Altmire, both Democrats who voted
against what is perceived as a House Democrat bill. Now that the
House has passed its version of the bill, we are waiting on for
the Senate to take action. Harry Reid (D-NV) Senate Majority
Leader, has merged the two Senate versions of the bill (the
Senate Finance and Health Education Committee version and the
Labor and Pensions Committee version) into a single proposal for
the Senate to consider.
Independent sector is urging nonprofits to continue
contacting your Senators. Urge them include health care
incentives that treat nonprofit and for-profit employers equally
and provide direct assistance to nonprofit employers so that
they may provide health insurance for their employees Tax
credits provided in the House bill for small employers won't
help most nonprofit employers because they don’t pay income tax.
Read more at
http://independentsector.org/programs/gr/HealthCareReform_Action.htm.
For background, check out the Nonprofit Times news article
Healthcare Reform At What Cost? at
http://www.nptimes.com/09Oct/npt-091001-1.html.
10/27/09
44 Members of Congress Stand Up for Nonprofits
For Immediate Release Contact: David A. Ross, J.D, PANO
Public Policy Officer 717-236-8584 x1009;
david@pano.org
(Harrisburg, PA; October 26, 2009) 44 members of Congress
stood up for the millions of workers employed by America's
nonprofits. Those 44 Representatives sent a letter last Friday
urged House leaders to include nonprofit employers in the final
House health care reform bill. Unless Congress acts, 640,000
workers employed by Pennsylvania nonprofits would be left
without the protections that national health care reform will
provide to employees of for-profit businesses.
The letter, signed by 44 members of Congress from 22 states,
to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer,
underscored the fact that the vast majority of nonprofits are
small employers experiencing the same unsustainable increases in
insurance premiums that small for-profit businesses experience.
The letter pointed out that "none of the current House bills
extend reforms and benefits to the nonprofit sector. As written,
the tax credit provisions included by the House to address the
needs of small, for-profit business would not be available to
small nonprofit employers."
Congresswoman McCollum (D-MN), a respected champion of
nonprofits, explained her reason for initiating the letter and
leading this effort to bring the nonprofit sector’s health care
reform concerns to the attention of Speaker Pelosi and Majority
Leader Hoyer: "The millions of Americans who work in the
nonprofit sector must be included in health care reform. The
nonprofit sector includes a wide range of small and midsize
organizations, from food banks and homeless shelters to health
clinics and domestic violence shelters that are all working to
improve life for families in our local communities. It's only
fair that nonprofit organizations receive comparable treatment
to the small business sector in health care reform legislation."
“For the most part, nonprofits can’t use tax credits because
they don’t generate taxable income. In other respects, they are
small local businesses,” said David Ross, Public Policy Officer
for Pennsylvania Association of Nonprofit Organizations (PANO).
“90% of Pennsylvania’s nonprofits are small with budgets below
$1 million. Like their for-profit counterparts, small nonprofits
can no longer afford to pay ever-increasing health insurance
premiums,” Ross added. “This is especially critical given the
current recession. Nonprofits are being forced to provide
increased levels of services without an increase in funding.
Congress must address the needs of small, nonprofit employers.
At the very least, Congress should provide the same level of
health care relief to nonprofits as they are providing to small
for-profit businesses.”
Tim Delaney, President & CEO of the National Council of
Nonprofits, underscored Congresswoman McCollum's concerns:
"Every dollar nonprofit employers pay in higher insurance
premiums is another dollar taken away from delivering essential
food, shelter, clothing, and other vital services that people
need in this devastating economy. Individuals employed by
nonprofits should not be penalized because they work for public
good rather than private gain." Delaney added, "We hope that the
White House will now step forward to join this growing chorus in
the House and Senate who recognize that nonprofits are vital
employers who cannot be left behind on health care reform."
The National Council of Nonprofits and Pennsylvania
Association of Nonprofit Organizations will continue to work
with the broad coalition of nonprofits that has been working
with the House and Senate to incorporate provisions in the
health care reform bills that would treat small nonprofit
employers and for-profit business employers with parity. We
invite our members of Pennsylvania’s Congressional delegation to
step forward with us and join Congressman Sestak and the growing
chorus in the House and Senate that recognize that nonprofits
are vital employers that cannot be left behind on health care
reform.
###
September 13 New York Times story, “Nonprofit
Groups Upset at Exclusion from Health Bills” · “Nonprofit
organizations say they are upset that Congress and the Obama
administration have not addressed their rising health care costs
in the various health care proposals being floated on Capitol
Hill.”
Column in The Nonprofit Quarterly: “Nonprofits:
We Must Start Beating the Drum”
· Provides basic statistics about the nonprofit sector
· Demonstrates how nonprofits have been excluded
· Offers leads for stories in various states (see the
insightful posted comments)
The Cohen Report: “Whither
Health Care Reform”
· Provides sound points and cites important statistics
10/1/09
Update from the National Council of Nonprofit Organizations
9/30/09
Nonprofit H1N1 Flu Prevention Toolkit from the National
Council of Nonprofit Organizations.
8/12/09 Voice Support for
Nonprofit Federal Health Care Incentives. Congress has been
exploring options to give to employers as incentives for
providing federal healthcare to their employees. Two proposals
are currently under consideration by committees in both
Congressional houses. The President has made federal healthcare
reform the priority of his Administration for the rest of this
year and nonprofits will be directly impacted by healthcare
reform Congress will enact in the coming months. PANO and
Independent Sector ask you to urge your member of Congress to
support nonprofit incentives in the upcoming healthcare reform
bills.
The first plan, entitled the Program Credit Approach, was
included in the bill approved by the Senate Health, Education,
Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee. This plan would provide a
subsidy (called a “program credit”) to both for-profit and
nonprofit employers to assist them in providing healthcare for
their employees. To qualify for this credit, the employer must
pay 60% of the premium costs, have fewer than 50 employees, and
have an average employee salary of less than $50,000. This
subsidy would be available for up to three consecutive years and
would reduce the premiums paid by the employer by applying the
funds directly to the Health Insurance Exchange as outlined in
the American Affordable Health Choices Act passed by the Senate
HELP Committee.
The second plan, entitled the Tax Credit Approach, was
included in the House Ways and Means Committee’s healthcare
bill. This plan would provide a tax credit equal to 50% of the
cost for employee healthcare for an organization with less than
10 employees and an average wage of $20,000. However, as written
this plan does not include nonprofits of similar size. The
Senate Finance Committee is considering a similar method of
funding for their bill, but it is expected to be less generous
than the Ways and Means’ version. The Senate Finance Committee
has yet to release a draft of their bill, but has indicated it
intends to hold a mark-up of its bill in by September 15, 2009.
It is vital that lawmakers understand that nonprofit
employers need incentives for providing healthcare coverage that
are equivalent to those provided to for-profit organizations. We
urge you to contact key members of the Senate Finance Committee
and voice your support for nonprofit healthcare coverage
incentives.
Check out Independent Sector for
talking points on the new proposals. Download a
sample letter to help you make the case for nonprofit
Incentives.
7/31/09 Governor Rendell has signed a new bill that will
affect small and large businesses.
Please review this
important
information to learn how Act 2 of 2009 will impact your
business.
7/15/09 House Releases
Comprehensive Healthcare Reform Bill. On Tuesday July 14,
2009, a comprehensive healthcare reform bill, cited as the
“America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009,” was released
by a House Democratic leaders. The Act calls for a
government-run insurance plan that would compete with private
insurance companies. The plan prohibits insurers from using
pre-existing conditions as a means to deny coverage. In
addition, the plan would provide tax credits to partially
subsidize health insurance for employers with 25 employees or
less and create a health insurance exchange. All Americans will
be required to obtain health insurance. The legislation has been
sent to the House Ways and Means Committee for mark-up, starting
Thursday July 16. Though Republicans are attempting to slow down
the legislation, House Democrats plan to have the bill passed by
the end of July. Read the newly-published “America’s
Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.”
7/15/09 Congress Seeks Taxes
and Deductions to Fund Federal Healthcare Reform. On July
14, 2009, the House Ways and Means Committee released their
healthcare reform legislation. The House funding proposal does
not contain a plan to curb tax benefits for nonprofit hospitals
that do not provide enough free medical care, as previously
proposed. Instead, to help pay for the over $1 trillion
healthcare overhaul, the three House committees with
jurisdiction over the issue (Ways and Means, Education and
Labor, and Energy and Commerce) will impose a surcharge on
individuals with an adjusted gross income of more than $280,000
and on households earning more than $350,000. The tax rate would
start around 1% for families making $350,000, up to 5.4% for
families making over $1 million. The tax is expected to raise
about $540 billion over 10 years, paying for nearly half of the
estimated cost of the legislation. The rest of the cost would be
covered through decreased spending on Medicare and other
government healthcare services. The Three Committees involved
are expected to mark-up their legislation on July 16, 2009.
The Senate Finance Committee will not be recommending a
surcharge on wealthy individuals and families for its
legislation. Instead, the Committee will look to adapt a version
of the President’s proposal to limit itemized deductions for
charitable contributions for high income taxpayers. No specific
details about the deductions have been released. Another
possible form of funding may come from taxing employer-provided
health benefits. Max Baucus, head of the Senate Finance
Committee will meet with the core group of negotiators on the
Committee on Tuesday, July 14, 2009 to further discuss forms of
funding the legislation. The Committee is expected to draft
their legislation in the coming weeks.
6/17/09
Federal Healthcare Legislation Expected this
Week.
The US Senate Finance Committee expects that it
will have health care legislation drafted by the end of this
week. The challenge is not how to expand health care coverage
to millions of Americans, but how to pay for it.
The US Senate Finance Committee is considering options
for funding proposed changes to the nation’s healthcare
system. Among these options is establishing a threshold of
minimum community benefit as a condition for hospitals to
receive charity status, not just a percentage contribution.
Existing nonprofit hospitals that fail to meet the minimum
level of charitable would be forced to pay an “excise tax”.
However, there is uncertainty as to what qualifies as a
community benefit. Some hospitals consider Medicare and
Medicaid costs to be charitable, while others do not. The bill
would need to clarify this ambiguity.
The Committee is also considering taxing healthcare
benefits worth more than $17,000 as regular income, while
allowing the cap to grow annually.
Variations on this plan
would raise the cap to $20,000 with less annual adjustment, or
use income as a factor for limiting taxes. According to the
Wall Street Journal, the Committee’s public healthcare plan
will focus on “nonprofit cooperatives that would be governed
by their members and would compete inside the new insurance
exchange”. To fund this plan, Senator Baucus has proposed
raising itemized tax deductions on personal health costs from
7.5% to 10%, or possibly doubling the tax penalty (to 20%) for
nonmedical withdrawals from tax preferred health savings
accounts.
6/2/09 US
Senate Finance Committee to Mark–Up
Health Care Reform Bill.
Last month (5/20/09) the US Senate Finance Committee
released a
report
discussing their options for financing healthcare reform and
justifications for targeting nonprofit hospitals. This month, the Senate Finance Committee plans to address
several key nonprofit issues such as nonprofit access to
health care coverage, insurance coverage,
incentives for
coverage and wellness,
and how to pay
for expanding health care coverage. PANO supports equivalent
healthcare coverage, benefits and prices available to federal
workers be given to nonprofit employees, as well as the
extension of tax credit incentives for the dispensation of
healthcare to include tax-exempt employers. The Committee is
even considering a way for nonprofits to pay for this by
limiting charitable tax exemptions and deductions.
The committee is considering a new community benefit
standard for nonprofit hospitals that will restrict their tax
deductions. The nonprofit hospitals could be required to
conduct an annual community needs analysis based on the level
of charity care they provide. In
addition, the Committee is considering a proposal from the
President’s budget that would lower the maximum tax deduction
for charitable giving from 35% to 28% for individuals whose
annual income exceeds $250,000.
Read the 5/14/09
Senate
Finance Committee Report on Expanding Health Care Coverage.
|