|
PANO Updates
3/30/10
Update The strategy to generate revenue for the state budget
is coming through an expansion of what will have sales tax
attached while reducing the sales tax from 6% to 4%. In all, 74
new items will be taxed if the plan goes through. Advocates
argue that the tax is oppressive and will hit the most
vulnerable Pennsylvania residents. Proponents say that there
are few alternatives if the government does not have an appetite
to raise property and wage taxes.
8/12/09
Sales Tax Expansion Still a Possibility. Expanding State Sales
tax to Services is once again being considered by lawmakers.
Expanding State sales tax to services might increase the State’s
sales tax revenues, but would impose greater stress on PA
Nonprofits and an already fragile economy. An expanded sales tax
would encourage individuals and organizations to buy products
outside of the state, which would deny border communities of
much-needed revenue. To address this threat, PANO is actively
working with PennCOST, the coalition against the expansion of
sales tax. Together we fought the expansion of sales tax in
2005/6 and again in 2006/7. Sales tax is regressive. Expanding
sales tax to services imposes hardship on lower income
Pennsylvanians.
Historical
Information from 2008 and prior years:
The Tax Plans
Rep. Perzel (HB1951) "Older
Pennsylvanian Property Tax Elimination Act". Uses gaming revenue
to eliminates property taxes for home owners age 65+ who earn
less than $40,000/yr. No expansion of the sales tax base.
http://johnperzel.com/?sectionid=268§iontree=268&itemid=1122.
Bill text at
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BH/2007/0/HB1951.HTM.
Rep. Rohrer (HB1275) "School Property Tax
Elimination Act of 2007" eliminates property taxes for everyone
but increases the state Income Tax by .5 to 1 % and expands the
sales tax base to tax services except core services “Computer,
Accounting, Engineer, Legal, and Research.” For the Rohrer bill
text go to
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BH/2007/0/HB1275.HTM.
See Rep. Rohrer’s website
http://www.samrohrer.com/?sectionid=75§iontree=75.
Or see PA Taxpayer’s Cyber Coalition promoting Rohrer’s bill
http://mysite.verizon.net/drbsr/PTCCWeb/solution.htm.
Rep. Levdansky-
(HB1600) increases
sales tax, and adds a .5% surcharge to property purchases, and a
.22% surcharge to Personal Income taxes. No expansion of the
sales tax base.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BH/2007/0/HB1600.HTM.
Sen. Piccola- (SB1041) calls
for broader sales tax base to eliminate school property taxes.
Will tax some nonprofit activities previously untaxed.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BH/2007/0/SB1041.HTM
or on his website at
http://www.piccola.org/pages/newsreleases/08-26-2005/948.asp.
Sen. Rhoades-(SB1108)
“Property Tax Elimination Act” state-wide referendum would
increase the current sales tax rate of 6% to a new rate of 9.19%
and the personal income tax would increase from its current rate
of 3.07% to a new rate of 4.36%. (10.19% sales tax in
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh)
http://www.senatorrhoades.com/press-2007/0907/092607.htm.
Rep. DeWeese (HB1489) raise sales
tax .5% (from 6% to 6.5%) to generate $750 million in property
tax reductions each year.
1/30/08 House Votes
Against Sales Tax Expansion. Yesterday, the Pennsylvania House
of Representatives voted NOT to expand the State sales tax base
to services and memberships. The Rohrer amendment (A05384) would
have taxed memberships, business professional services,
accounting and legal services provided to the general public, as
well as child care services. By a vote of 47 to 148, Rep.
Rohrer’s amendment (similar to HB1275) failed. Rep Levdansky’s
sales tax bill (HB1600) which does NOT expand the sales tax
base, will now move forward, WITHOUT taxing memberships and
services.
Yesterday’s vote was a major victory for nonprofits. Our
involvement was pivotal Following months of direct
communications with legislators, grassroots and grass-tops
advocacy, and collaboration with hundreds of charities and
dozens of the finest trade organizations in Harrisburg,
yesterday’s vote underscored our message: Charities are
important members of the community. We relieve government of
burden and improve the quality of life.
A revised sales tax expansion bill may be re-introduce this
year, next year, or the year after. When that occurs, PANO, the
YMCAs, PennCOST, the Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance, and
Pennsylvania’s nonprofit community will be waiting.
HB1275 [Rohrer] increases sales tax.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BH/2007/0/HB1275.HTM.
HB1600 [Levdansky] increases sales tax and PIT. Does NOT
expand the sales tax base.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BH/2007/0/HB1600.HTM.
11/19/07 Sales Tax bills
Introduced; House to Take-up Tax Reform Week of December 3.
The long awaited Rohrer bill was introduced in the house on
November 14. The Rohrer bill HB1275 would expand the base of
sales tax to include services, memberships and most business to
business services. Sen. Rhoades also introduced his tax reform
bill
SB1108 which would raise personal income tax and sales tax
in order to reduce property taxes. The House expects to Take-up
sales tax and property tax reform during the week of December 3.
PennCOST: The next meeting of PennCOST the sales tax
coalition will be held on Monday, November 26 at 10 am at the
Pennsylvania Bar Association in Harrisburg. All are welcome.
11/7/07 Legislature May
Postpone Sales Tax & Property Tax Reform Until Nov 19. The
House Calendar places HB1600 Levdansky’s tax reform bill at Nov
13, but a floor vote on the bill is not expected until the week
of November 19 at the earliest.
On October 31, the House Finance Committee approved two
separate sales tax bills HB1600 and HB1489. The Levdansky bill
HB1600 (PN2351) would provide $1.5 billion of property tax cuts
annually by increasing the state sales tax rate to 6.5 percent
from 6 percent and increasing the state income tax rate to 3.29
percent from 3.07 percent. The DeWeese bill HB1489 (PN1854)
would raise sales tax rates from 6% to 6.5% and provide for $750
million in property tax reductions annually. The Rohrer Plan to
expand the sales tax base has not yet been offered as a bill.
PANO the YMCA’s and PennCOST oppose expanding the sales tax
base to include business professional services, memberships,
health clubs, and previously untaxed items that are not subject
to unrelated business income tax. A number of sales tax reform
proposals seek to tax currently untaxed or exempt goods and
services. But expanding the sales tax base in order to reduce or
eliminate school property taxes merely shifts this tax burden
onto other less fortunate members of our communities.
TAKE ACTION: Urge your State Representative NOT to expand the
sales tax base.
http://capwiz.com/pano/issues/alert/?alertid=10468531&type=ST&show_alert=1.
10/11/07 State House Postpones
Sales Tax & Property Tax Reform Debate until the Week of October
29. Citing other legislation needing to be addressed, the
State House has postponed until the week of October 29 the date
they expect to address sales tax reform. House leadership is
still negotiating with Representatives Rohrer, Levdansky,
DeWeese, Perzel and other Representatives who have proposed
sales tax and property tax reforms. It is expected that at least
three bills will be reported out of the House Finance Committee,
during that week. There is some concern that the House may take
provisions from each bill to assemble one single “Franken-bill”.
Others are concerned that last minute amendments will cut-off
debate and force through a bill expanding the sales tax base to
include memberships or services that charities provide.
What can you do to prevent sales tax expanding to charities?
* Contact your legislator. Ask where they stand on expanding
State sales tax.
* Tell them not to tax memberships or business services that
charities provide or purchase.
* Tell your legislator that charities’ tax exemptions must be
preserved.
Don’t let the Legislature reach a compromise on sales tax by
sacrificing charities’ property tax exemptions.
The next meeting of the PA Sales Tax Coalition will be held
on Thursday, October 26, 2007, 10:00 am at the Pennsylvania Bar
Association in Harrisburg.
10/10/07 State House Expects to
Take-up Sales Tax & Property Tax Reform Starting Week of October
22. The State Legislature is expected to take-up both sales
tax reform and property tax reform beginning the week of October
22. There will not likely be a single bill, but rather a menu of
bills to be considered. Each bill will offer different
provisions and alternatives. One plan will be offered by Rep.
Sam Rohrer (R-128) in collaboration with the Commonwealth
Caucus.
The menu method will allow more than one bill to be adopted
and sent to the Senate, not one final bill. The result will be a
process lacking transparency or clarity, performed more by
committee than by the full legislature.
The charitable community has much at stake in this tax reform
initiative. It is incumbent upon the charitable community to
follow these proceedings closely, to become involved
proactively, and to stand ready if action becomes necessary.
Pennsylvania’s charitable nonprofit community supports
reasonable tax reform, but can not support shifting tax burdens
onto the working poor or curtailing property tax exemptions that
charities rely upon.
The next meeting of the PA Sales Tax Coalition will be held
on Thursday, October 11, 11:00 am at the Pennsylvania Bar
Association in Harrisburg.
Rohrer’s Sales tax plan
9/25/07 PANO Joins Sales Tax
Coalition to Prevent Sales Tax on Charities. PANO is
currently tracking three proposals that may expand state sales
tax to goods or services sold by charities. The Piccola bill
(SB1041), the Rohrer plan exempting only some core business to
business services, and the Levdansky bill (HB1600) proposing a
5% surtax. While there is no specific proposal to tax charities
at this time, charities do not have a blanket exemption. In 2005
and 2006, PANO worked with a broad coalition to help defeat, the
expansion of state sales tax to charities. That bill was amended
in the middle of the night and without warning.
9/12/07 State Legislators
Consider Sales Tax Expansion; Could Impact Charities. As the
legislature returned from summer recess, proposals for State
sales tax expansion could tax certain charitable activities.
State Senator Jeff Piccola (R-15) proposed
SB1041 to expands the sales tax base to include some
nonprofit activities previously untaxed. According to Piccola,
“We need a bold overhaul of our tax system in the form of total
elimination of our school property taxes and replace them with a
fairer, broader sales tax.”
Piccola's press release
9/12/07 Levdansky Holds
Hearing on Bill to Increase State Sales Tax by .5%. The PA
House Finance Committee Chairman David Levdansky, (D-39) will
hold a hearing at Wednesday, Sept. 12 on legislation to increase
State sales and use tax.
HB1600 would increase the state Sales and Use Tax and the
Personal Income Tax to fund a reduction in school property taxes
as early as next year. The hearing will begin at 10 a.m. at the
Penn State Greater Allegheny, Student Community Center, Robert
and Elizabeth Ostermayer Room, 4000 University Drive,
McKeesport.
http://www.pahouse.com/pr/039090707.asp.
Right now, Neither SB1041 nor HB1600 includes language that
will subject thousands of charities to State sales tax. However,
PANO members who worked with us to help defeat sales tax on
charities (SB854 of 2006) will remember that the offensive
language taxing certain charitable activities was inserted into
that bill late at night without warning. The State Sales Tax
debate is expected to heat-up in October. How it impacts the
charitable nonprofit sector may be up to us.
9/13/06 Proposed Sales Tax Bill
would tax some business-to-business services. State Rep. Sam
Rohrer, Chairman of the Commonwealth Caucus plans to introduce a
comprehensive property tax sales tax reform bill. This new
proposal would eliminate school property taxes by lowering state
sales tax to 5%, and broadening the sales tax base to include
some services and goods currently exempt. Some essential
business-to-business services like accounting, engineering, and
legal services, will remain tax exempt under his proposal,
others will not. No list of specific goods or services to be
exempt under this proposal has been released. PANO will continue
to monitor this issue and update our members as it develops.
8/30/06 State Rep to introduce
comprehensive property tax and sales tax reform bill. On
August 23, PA Rep. Rohrer, Chair of the Commonwealth Caucus,
along with other House members, announced their plan to
introduce a comprehensive property tax sales tax reform bill.
This new proposal would eliminate school property taxes by
lowering state sales tax to 5%, and broadening the sales tax
base to include some services and good currently exempt. In
addition to the original key sales tax exemptions such as doctor
visits and prescription medicine, this bill provides sales tax
exemptions for such goods as fresh meats and produce,
residential utilities, and essential business-to-business
services like accounting, engineering, research, computer, and
legal services. No list of specific goods or services to be
exempt under this proposal has been released. PANO will continue
to monitor this issue and update our members as it develops.
2/1/06 Senate Bill 854 Sales Tax
Expansion Update. Senate Bill 854, which would expand base
of sales tax to include certain activities of nonprofits, is
still active and in committee under consideration by the
legislature. Smaller amendments have been proposed which would
exclude specific items. PANO opposes this bill because it would
tax nonprofit activities such as memberships, fundraising
programs and professional services. This would create an undue
burden on the nonprofit sector at a time when funding is already
scarce and government support is increasingly limited. PANO and
the YMCA testified on January 4 on
behalf of the nonprofit community. Other PANO member
organizations have issued statements to the committee for the
record.
1/18/06 Second Senate
Hearing on Sales Tax Expansion Held Today. The
Pennsylvania State Senate held a second hearing today regarding
the expansion of sales tax under Senate Bill 854. PANO and the
YMCA testified at the first hearing on January 4 regarding the
impact this bill will have to nonprofits. SB 854, as amended by
the House on December 20, 2005, could impose sales tax on
membership fees, fundraising activities, as well as consulting
services. PANO has actively participated in an effort to raise
public awareness for the unintended consequences of this bill.
A second hearing is being held today. PANO has actively
participated in an effort to raise public awareness for the
unintended consequences of this bill. For more information
regarding other testimony and written statements to the Senate
Committee go to
http://www.pasenategop.com/news/sb854-010405-hearing.htm.
PANO
Testimony January 4, 2006
For other testimony given today,
click
here.
To: Committee on Legislation for the Special Session on
Property Taxes.
Senator Noah W. Wenger, Chairman
Senator John N. Wozniak, Democrat Chairman
From: Joe
Geiger, Executive Director, Pennsylvania
Association of Nonprofit Organizations (PANO)
Re: The
sales tax expansion of Senate Bill 854 (PN 1429)
Charitable exemption and "management consulting services"
Good Morning
Chairman Wenger and Chairman Wozniak. Thank you for the
opportunity to testify before this Committee. My name is Joe
Geiger. I am the Executive Director of Pennsylvania Association
of Nonprofit Organizations (PANO). PANO is the statewide
membership organization serving and advancing the charitable
nonprofit sector through leadership, advocacy, education and
services in order to improve the quality of life in
Pennsylvania. PANO is the 501(c) (3) charitable nonprofit
association representing the nonprofit community throughout the
Commonwealth since 1984. PANO was instrumental in facilitating
the charity coalition negotiating through Act 55, “the
Institutions of Purely public charities Act” in 1997.
The sales tax
expansion of Senate Bill 854 (PN 1429) is of great concern to
PANO and to our member organizations. It is of great concern to
the entire community partly because the bill passed so quickly,
and is difficult to understand. The following statement will
outline PANO’s concerns with expanding the sales tax base in
this manner.
Procedure:
Before I begin,
I would like to acknowledge this Committee for the fair and open
manner in which this hearing is being conducted. On December
20th, 2005, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed SB
854 by a narrow margin, but not before adding 7 separate
amendments to the bill. There was not sufficient opportunity to
review the amended language. Instead on December 21st,
the charitable community and the community at-large woke up to a
surprise. The complexity of the bill itself adds to the
confusion. As this process moves forward into the coming weeks,
I hope that this hearing marks the beginning of a trend toward
openness and cooperation. Only by sharing ideas in an open
forum and in the spirit of bipartisanship will tax reform be
successful.
Charitable
Exclusions:
PANO is greatly
concerned that the expansion of the sales tax to include the
activities of the charitable sector under SB 854 contradicts the
expressed public policy of the tax exclusions granted to
Pennsylvania’s charities in 1997 by Act 55 the “Institutions of
Purely Public Charities Act”. Act 55 expressly grants property
tax exemptions to qualified charities to advance specific
charitable causes and activities. Even though the main focus of
Act 55 is property tax exemption for charities, Act 55’s policy
rationale is equally applicable to the sales tax provision of SB
854. According to Act 55’s legislative intent, “[b]ecause
institutions of purely public charity contribute to the common
good or lessen the burden of government, the historic policy of
exempting these institutions from taxation should be
continued.” Senate Bill 856 as amended by the House grants
only partial exclusions to organizations currently not subject
to sales tax. Expanding the sales tax base in this manner will
only serve to increase the tax burden on people trying to access
charity services and the administrative costs born by charitable
nonprofits and may cause charities to reduce services provided.
“Sale to or use
by”:
Under section
1204(10)(I))(A) The sale at retail to or use by any charitable
organization will be subject to the sales tax. The phrase “sale
to or use by” fails to exclude a number of activities essential
to the functioning of charitable organizations. These
activities are not “sale to or use by” a charity, but rather
they are “sale by” a charity. Under the bill, a sale of goods
or services by a charity to an entity that is not a charity will
be subject to the applicable sales tax. PANO is concerned that
this will tax charitable fundraising activities, membership
dues, program revenues, and consulting services when provided by
a charity to an entity that is not a charity. These programs
now subject to the tax represent a substantial portion of PANO’s
charitable mission.
Fundraising
sales:
Senate Bill 854
as amended would tax fundraising sales by a charity where the
product sold is now a taxable item. There is a specific
exemption for fundraising sales of food and beverages by
Nonprofit Associations which support sports programs.
See section 1204(49). While the retail sale of food or
beverages “at or from” (similar to “by”) schools or churches in
the ordinary course of the activities of such organization is
excluded from the exclusion (therefore taxable) under section
1204(29)(V). You may see why this bill is potentially going to
be very confusing to figure out what it is really saying. There
is no similar exclusion for charities like the Girls Scouts. Do
the Girl Scouts provide less benefit to the community merely
because they do not play sports? Must they “support sports
programs” to raise funds by selling sandwiches without having to
worry about calculating the sales tax? Ultimately, this
provision is a negative incentive for smaller organizations to
participate in small fundraisers.
Memberships
fees:
PANO opposes
expanding the sales tax base to include membership dues paid by
entities that are not 501(c)(3) charities to 501(c)(3)
charities. Such memberships are the lifeblood of many
membership organizations. Membership organizations serve the
community by sharing information, promoting efficiency, and
encouraging economic opportunity. Membership organizations that
are charities often have members who are not 501(c)(3)
charities. Members may be 501(c)(4)’s, (6)’s, corporate
sponsors, or individuals. For smaller organizations operating
in this increasingly lean economic climate, membership is often
the first place to cut-back. Maintaining an organization’s
active membership base is no longer to be taken for granted.
The unfortunate
consequence of taxing membership fees will be higher membership
dues, fewer members, and ultimately cuts in services.
Program Revenue:
Educational
programming is a core service that PANO provides. Expanding the
tax base to include program service revenue would discourage the
sharing of information. PANO frequently hosts workshops and
clinic sessions designed to assist charities and those who work
with charities to serve their organization more effectively.
Occasionally PANO will host a workshop or seminar in a rural
community. Would this be taxable as a management consulting
service if an attendee was not a charity? Would the
registration fee now be taxable as program revenue? It can be
challenging just to register enough people to break even. Taxing
such revenue would force higher fees, fewer registrations, and
in rural locations more cancelled programs.
Management
consulting services:
PANO firmly
believes that taxing “management consulting services” will have
a detrimental effect on the nonprofit community for years to
come. “Providing advice and assistance to… other
organizations… in.. the… areas.. [of] (1) Management and
operating advice, such as strategic and organizational planning”
is a core service of PANO. While most of the organizations (our
members) to whom we provide these services are 501(c)(3)
charities, other are not. Should PANO charge sales tax where we
consult to assist a former charity to obtain or regain its
501(c)(3) charitable exemption status? What about where a
professional fundraiser wishes to attend a PANO sponsored
educational forum? The nonprofit community is populated with
organizations of every type, supporting organizations,
for-profit businesses, individuals, funders, consultants,
employees and volunteers. This is one hypothetical. PANO
provides a multitude of management consulting services to its
members regardless of 501(c) status.
"Management
consulting services" are essential to the functioning of smaller
nonprofits. These services are not just provided by large
companies or just purchased by large companies. Many small
businesses will be faced the challenge of understanding this
bill and their new obligations. The Department of Revenue will
face the daunting task of whacking these businesses if they
don’t collect the right amount of tax, and what to do once it is
collected. There are costs associated with such enforcement for
both the Department of Revenue and for the charity. This
increased administrative burden placed on a comparatively less
sophisticated entity will force the charity to divert resources
from their core mission to cover increased administrative
costs. Taxing smaller charities in this way will discourage
smaller fundraising projects, and increase reliance on fewer
sources of income.
Implementation
& compliance:
Quarterly
reporting of sales tax collected will pose an onerous burden
especially on smaller charities. Section 1217 (D) small
taxpayers would permit the Department of Revenue to waive
quarterly filling requirements where taxes raised do not exceed
$75 per quarter. Unfortunately, this seventy-five dollar ($75)
is too low to be practical.
Other states:
With respect to
"similar legislation from other states” my colleagues from the
Pennsylvania Insurance Federation and from the Pennsylvania
Alliance of YMCAs will address the matter in greater detail. I
would only add that a healthy and dynamic charitable nonprofit
community is essential to Pennsylvania’s future.
Conclusion:
PANO recognizes
the importance of tax reform to Pennsylvania’s future.
However, we have agreed to testify before this Committee because
we strongly believe that Senate Bill 854 as amended by the House
of Representatives on December 20, 2005, will impose an economic
hardship on Pennsylvania’s charitable nonprofit community.
This expansion
of sales tax base to include certain charitable activities is
not a solid base for positive tax reform. Charities had
previously received an exemption due the beneficial role they
play in our communities. Appropriate tax reform legislation
should not result in tax policies that discourage economic
development, and actually harm the very institutions that help a
community meet the needs of its least advantaged.
Taxes are more
than just a vehicle for raising revenue. Taxes demonstrate the
values that we as a society hold dear. Thank you for granting
me this opportunity to testify today. I will be available to
answer your question today and in the coming weeks. |